ASTRO-GRAPHO-CRIMINOLOGY: GARLASCO CRIME

by Laura Poggiani

 

 

 

For some time now, it's been the talk of the town, especially since the investigation was reopened, with almost daily twists and turns, real or presumed, but always duly amplified by the media.

We won't retrace the history of this tangled affair, which features sloppy investigations, key witnesses who have since disappeared, and figures who, depending on the journalist in question, gain more or less prominence. Instead, we'll use the now well-described astrographological comparison method in my book "Astro-Grafo-Criminologia" https://amzn.eu/d/0abj1fSf

 

Let's now compare the two writings of the main protagonists of this story: Alberto Stasi and Andrea Sempio.

 

 

One observation is immediately obvious, even to the layman: both writings immediately speak to closed personalities, who project a self-image very different from reality.

Stasi's handwriting is in block capitals, despite the rather intimate text addressed to his father at the time of his death. Those who use this style of writing tend to prioritize a public image over a private, much more hidden one. Yet, it is still clear and legible, albeit with a wavering flow, demonstrating that ideas, after all, flow in a non-chaotic, linear, and well-balanced manner, but the flow betrays a constant shift in thought, stance, and mood. The detached character of the letters, being in block capitals, adds a particular coldness to the feelings and their expression, a phenomenon which, as we have unfortunately seen in other cases, often indicates a certain lack of affectivity that, in extreme cases, can be dangerous.

Andrea Sempio's case is quite different: despite his signature being the most important part of a piece of writing, it's practically difficult, if not in some places almost impossible, to clearly distinguish the letters, often blended together or even skipped altogether. Those with these traits don't necessarily have impaired cognitive processes, especially in the first case, but the combination of these two characteristics indicates that thoughts don't flow properly but can be prone to jerks, easily shifting from states of euphoria to depression, with rapid shifts from emotionality to much more crude and dark moments, alternating moments of intense involvement with outright contempt.

But upon closer inspection of the two handwritings, we find, as always, clear connections with Astrographology.


   

Stasi clearly shows, with the "TT" sign, the sign of Gemini not closed at the base. In his natal chart, Mercury is conjunct the Sun and Mars, opposite Neptune, which leads to a certain cerebral voyeurism, which is compounded by the Gemini glyph open at the bottom: our man is accustomed to fantasizing, trying to recreate erotic scenes that heighten his imagination in experiencing Eros.

 

In Sempio's case, however, the astro-graphological reference is even more pronounced and consistent:

We find the sign of Scorpio clearly delineated in the "m" of his surname, along with the glyph of Pluto, the Lord of Scorpio, in the capital "S" of his surname. This brings us back primarily to his self-image, that is, of a person with very strong drives, accustomed, however, to hiding his most intimate thoughts, but also attracted to borderline and "black" situations, as Pluto himself suggests. In his natal chart, Pluto finds itself in the curious position of being in the 4th House, where it holds sway, opposite Venus in the 10th House: his vision of women involves thoughts and imaginations where women become a sort of sacrificial soul. Added to this is a very strong stellium in Capricorn, which again evokes tendencies toward secrecy, isolation, but also stubbornness in pursuing one's goals, in the 6th House, the everyday.

 

While this writing does not intend to point the finger at either side, because the task of this writing is above all to illustrate a method, we do however have to make one observation: these two men who, directly or indirectly, revolved around Chiara, both present, from the analysis of their writing, rather particular aspects of their personality.

 


Text by Laura Poggiani - All rights reserved